Search for: "Guest v. State"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 4,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
Good news for those patent folk who have been diligently following (or attempting to follow) the thread of comments that followed the guest post by Walter Hart and Reiner Wijnstra (EP&C) on Poisonous Divisionals. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
One is the thoughtful and articulate John Noble (Director of the British Brands Group); another is recent guest Kat Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons), who is currently also a Deputy District Judge. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Over on the 1709 Blog, Iona Harding tackles SAS v WPL and the continuing question of whether copyright can vest in a computer language, while Simon Fogarty guests some hot and revealing news concerning New Zealand's three sheep strikes and you're out file-sharing ruling. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:49 am
[This guest post was written by Stephanie Stella, an associate in the Trademark Group at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.]. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
Garan Incorporated v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
First, in Armstrong v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
Kats in residence will be Jeremy (in the chair), Eleonora and Laetitia -- with one-time guest Kat Robert too! [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:10 pm
” Houston v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
On Afro-IP, Caroline NCube's series on African states' IP policy takes her alphabetically from Cameroon to Comoros. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:48 am
From that side of the pond United States and Canada are members [full list of members can be found here]. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:36 am
V. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
26 May 2016, 10:57 am
Winslow Jr. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
[i] Lynch v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
This means that embedding videos which are freely available on, for example (and is it was the case here) YouTube, does not constitute an infringement of the right of communication/making available to the public if the work concerned is neither directed at a new public nor communicated by using specific technical means different from that used for the initial communication.Another case referencing Svennson is the recent decision by Mr Justice Arnold in 1967 Ltd & Others v British… [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:16 pm
Environmental water : advances in treatment, remediation and recycling / V. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Much of the research he presents "has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 10:00 am
Thanks so much to the Legal History Blog team for inviting me to guest blog this month. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am
Under the current system, the compensation is calculated annually and charged to the State Budget on the basis of the expected damages inflicted to the right holders as a result of the private copying use. [read post]
