Search for: "In re Branch" Results 3281 - 3300 of 6,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2023, 3:26 pm by Amy Howe
“We have considered that” question, he continued, “and we’re prepared to deal with it. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:52 pm by Sarah Lindsey
  The Court did not find this fact bothersome because administrative agencies like the DEQ are part of the executive branch, and the Michigan Constitution gives the governor “real control over the executive branch. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:57 am
  Our Firm recommends that employers re-double their efforts to make sure their current I-9’s conform to the law. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:06 pm
We're all used to legal arguments resting on court opinions, but it's unusual to see a public policy argument defended in this way. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:55 am
  The court suggested that empowering a body other than the executive branch of the U.S. government to restrict American actions abroad would interfere with the government's ability to pursue effective foreign policy. [read post]
18 May 2022, 8:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
I'm not the person to make sense of what they're doing, because it doesn't hang together for me. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:40 pm
Certain considerations are applicable to analysis under either branch. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:49 am by SHG
  It’s the executive branch Nixon answer, that the president can commit no crime because he’s the president. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm by Jay Rivera
  Unlike the other branches of government, the judiciary has been largely resistant to video recordings of sessions. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 6:01 am by Jennifer Davis
” Constitution and Laws of the Cherokee Nation                               [http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3b08830]The President of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, Ross Swimmer, signed the 1975 Constitution that superseded the 1839 Constitution; this version included a bill of rights, three branches of government, specifications for tribal citizenship and rules for elections. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am by Leland E. Beck
Res. 36, a joint “resolution of disapproval” of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Representation – Case Proceedings, a joint resolution that the President had threatened to veto in any event. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:10 pm by James Hamilton
The De Larosière report highlighted that one of the problems leading to the financial crisis was an inconsistent implementation of financial services rules leading to a fragmented internal market. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:44 am by SHG
Like pro wrestling, they’re putting on a show to please their audience. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 3:28 pm by Steven Calabresi
  Haley knows how to run a large executive branch, and she has done so with great success. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am by SHG
” Is the waiver and modification of $430 billion worth of debt, the shifting of the burden of that debt from the students who assumed it in exchange for the education and, for some, degree they received to the backs of those who had no vote in their decision and gained no benefit (provided you’re not an aficionado of chaos theory) an “unprecedented” exercise of authority by the executive branch of powers relegated to the legislative branch? [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:05 pm by Marissa Martino Golden
Who will be left to provide the expertise needed to issue scientifically sound, evidence-based regulations should a future President seek to re-regulate? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:13 pm
In their conclusions, the Council confirmed the week's earlier rumors that Paris would host the Central Division of the Unified Patent Court, with a London branch of the Court dealing with pharmaceuticals and a Munich branch dealing with mechanical engineering (not automotive which was the earlier rumor). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am by Charles Sartain
 37, p. 276 if you’re interested) and decisions as early as Marbury v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am by John Malcolm
In entering this order, President Trump’s power was “at its maximum” because, as the court stated in 2015 in Zivotofsky ex re. [read post]