Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3281 - 3300 of 7,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2008, 1:23 am
I mentioned yesterday the new case in the High Court of England and Wales regarding software patents, Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General Of Patents. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:36 am by JURIST Staff
V Ramana at an event Saturday organized by the Karnataka State Bar Council to pay tribute to Late Mr. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:07 am by Richard M. Re
As part of my ongoing quest to discover under-appreciated jurisdictional issues, I'd like to return to the Court's recent decision in Town of Greece v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
If the submission of an acceptable, unconditional offer to conclude a licensing agreement is a prerequisite for abuse of a dominant market position: Does Article 102 TFEU lay down particular qualitative and/or time requirements in relation to that offer? [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:27 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
Some are calling the Court of Chancery’s decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by Jeff Gamso
  He alone believed (see United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Matthew Flinn
The assembled protesters, having been urged by organisers to “lay siege” to financial institutions, tried to set fire to the Royal Bank of Scotland building, threw missiles, and looted computer equipment. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In other words, “[t]he distinction between ordinary negligence and malpractice turns on whether the acts or omissions complained of involve a matter or medical science or art requiring special skills not ordinarily possessed by lay persons or whether the conduct complained of can instead be assessed on the basis of the common everyday experience of the trier of the facts” (Papa v Brunswick Gen. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]