Search for: "Lowe v. State"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 9,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Absent a “a reasonably high degree of probability that the presumed fact follows from those proved directly” (People v Leyva, 38 NY2d 160, 166), “the danger . . . is that of logical gaps – that is, subjective inferential links based on probabilities of low grade or insufficient degree – which undetected, elevate coincidence and, therefore, suspicion into permissible inference” (People v Cleague, 22 NY2d 363). [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:52 pm
There is a curious irony to Judge Weinstein's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am
Jackson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
(Poet, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:57 am
The PCT’s policy for patients with GID stated that “cosmetic” breast surgery was a low priority, as there was “no evidence that [it] will resolve psychological symptoms, only which arise from the size and or shape of the breast. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
If we read the cases that build this new commercial speech doctrine, cases like Virginia Pharmacy and IMS v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:43 am
The case is Nielson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:59 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 2:42 pm
This week, EFF, along with EPIC and NACDL, filed an amicus brief in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:47 am
The BoA noted that the Opposition Division did not state this to be the case here, nor had Pinball filed any arguments in this respect. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:51 pm
Clearly, the low success rate diminishes the potential impact of drug treatment court programs. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:19 am
The General Court affirmed that the ORO marks could not be said to be scarcely distinctive, and Case T-344/03 Saiwa v OHIM-Barilla Alimentare (SELEZIONE ORO BARILLA could not be said to have established a precedent. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:58 am
In Vance v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Weidman et al., v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm
Today there will be a key hearing, styled as a "case management conference", before Judge Lucy Koh, relating to the first of two Apple v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
Boessenecker v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
Cooper v. [read post]
