Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 3281 - 3300 of 5,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Karel.Frielink
Frielink, Visie Land op overheids-NV’s verkeerd [Vision Country on government-owned NVs incorrect], Antilliaans Dagblad 15 April 2011, p. 16 and M.L. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:24 am by Susan Brenner
., Kurtz Criminal Offenses and Defenses in Georgia, Prostitution and Related Offenses, p. 1379 (2011 ed.)). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm by paperstreet
See blog.copyrightalliance.org; jdsupra.com; and arl.com (”Issue Brief: GSU Fair Use Decision Recap and Implications” by B. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am by Jeralyn
Accordingly, the accused in such a case would be entitled to pretrial bail as a matter of right for such offense. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The disclaimer of claim 1 (“non-human”) excludes human beings in order to satisfy A 53(a) while the disclaimers of claims 11 and 14 exclude subject-matter which is not patentable under A 53(b) taken in combination with R 28, paragraphs b) and c). [4] The three disclaimers which exclude subject-matter not eligible for patent protection and only serve the purpose of removing specific legal obstacles do not contribute to the invention. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:36 am by Adam Thierer
Generally speaking, Palfrey and Gasser believe increased interoperability — especially among information networks and systems — is a good thing because it “provides consumers greater choice and autonomy” (p. 57), “is generally good for competition and innovation” (p. 90), and “can lead to systemic efficiencies” (p. 129). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:00 am by stevehansen
See also MPEP § 608.01(a), § 608.01(p) and § 707.05(b). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:54 pm
§§ 801.32 & 802.31 [vi] Rules, Regulations, Statements and Interpretations under the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, 1976, Chapter I, Sub-Chapter H, p. 30. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
[iii] Einer Elhauge and Damien Geradin, Global Competition Law and Economics, (Hart, 2011), p. 913 [iv] What amounts to effective control depends on the facts of a particular case. [read post]