Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 3281 - 3300 of 4,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus the Board found that examination of all the objections under A 100(b) was appropriate. [2.3.1] Although the respondent argued that the subject matter of claim 1 could only be considered under A 100(b) once a form of claim had been arrived at which fulfilled the requirements of A 100(c), the Board finds that A 100(c) requirements do not outweigh the requirements under A 100(b), nor that there should be a presumption that the claims would necessarily be found… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Reference: Liu C, Pitts RJ, Bohbot JD, Jones PL, Wang G, et al. 2010 Distinct Olfactory Signaling Mechanisms in the Malaria Vector Mosquito Anopheles gambiae. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, CIL is violated whenever a State, “as a matter of state policy,… practices, encourages or condones (a) genocide, (b) slavery… (c) the murder or causing the disappearance of individuals, (d) torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment… or (g) a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 9:35 am by Terry Lenamon
A work that constitutes a Collection will not be considered an Adaptation (as defined above) for the purposes of this License. c. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
Why context matters: defining service animals under federal law. 37 Pepp. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The petitioner based its petition on two alleged defects: a violation of the right to be heard (A 112a(2) (c) and A 113) and a violation of the principle of impartiality, A 112a(2)(d) and R 104. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
   whereas, notwithstanding this, it has been criticised following a number of rulings of the Court of Justice and is in need of modernisation, C. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
(c) Search without warrantAny officer or employee of the Service authorized and designated under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General, whether individually or as one of a class, shall have power to conduct a search, without warrant, of the person, and of the personal effects in the possession of any person seeking admission to the United States, concerning whom such officer or employee may have reasonable cause to suspect that grounds exist for denial of admission to the United… [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 11:37 pm by Steve Vladeck
” New § 2256(c) deals with “jurisdiction and venue,” although in addition to vesting exclusive jurisdiction in the D.C. district court (even if the detainee is moved somewhere else), § 2256(c)(2)(B) purports to bar the exercise of that jurisdiction over any claim other than a “challenge to the legality of the continued detention” of the petitioner, including claims “relating to the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:00 am by Stephen Page
The consequence is that neither [the husband], [C] or [J] can receive any part of that benefit. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
  [2.1] [… C]laim 1 [of the main request] was amended in comparison to claim 1 [as granted]. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:57 am by Ron
But just as P&G faces risk in extending its brand, so too would BigLaw. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:14 am by Kelley Jones King
  Alejandro Moreno, Jr. of Edinburg commented on proposed Rule 1.08(g)(2) regarding arbitration. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:50 am by By DEALBOOK
.'s talks with Banco BTG Pactual to buy a 15 percent stake in the Brazilian investment bank worth about $2.4 billion are at an advanced stage, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing a person familiar with the matter. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:54 pm by Greg McNeal
Ashcroft, 308 F. 3d 198, 219 (3rd Cir. 2002) stating "[G]iven judges' relative lack of expertise regarding national security and their inability to see the mosaic, we should not entrust to them the decision whether an isolated fact is sensitive enough to warrant closure. [read post]