Search for: "Matter of Novel" Results 3281 - 3300 of 7,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2016, 8:00 am by Rebecca Ingber
The internal forces of continuity and the forces of aggrandizement sometimes operate in tension (such as when a president makes novel claims to power), and sometimes work together (such as when a president seeks to dial back such claims, in which case the internal forces for continuity and those for aggrandizement both stand in his way), to slowly advance and then to entrench executive claims to power. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
., before or after a party's deposition.Typically, the courts have previously held, at least in the case of video surveillance completed on a party, that such surveillance information need not be produced in state court civil litigation matters until after the completion of a party's deposition.The trial court judges in Dauphin County, including Judge Andrew H. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Michael Linhorst
That First Amendment argument may seem novel, but it actually has a decades-long history in the context of journalists trying to gain access to criminal proceedings. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am by INFORRM
 Whilst it is a ground-breaking case, the Court of Appeal acknowledged that it is a novel one. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:25 pm by Robert Chesney
    SMO scenario 2--Foreign kill/capture with US military "coordination": Part (1)(B) is novel and quite interesting. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
”  In fact, the Court concluded that “plaintiff’s idea was neither new, novel, original nor concrete,” and that the Court “cannot perceive how plaintiff on any theory in law can succeed in this action. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
”  In fact, the Court concluded that “plaintiff’s idea was neither new, novel, original nor concrete,” and that the Court “cannot perceive how plaintiff on any theory in law can succeed in this action. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Just over a year ago, AIPPI hosted a Rapid Response seminar following Mr Justice Arnold finding that the material claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in the treatment of pain were invalid and in any event not infringed by Actavis’ skinny label pregabalin product Lecaent (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by Daniel Nazer
This leads to numerous silly and non-novel design patents. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Also in 2015, Clare released redesigned book covers that printed the words “A Shadowhunters Novel” along the right side or bottom of the covers. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:30 am by SHG
That being the case, it was only a matter of time before the NY Times hopped aboard the hypocrite express. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:30 am
  Such novel and complex settlement arrangements encompassing different categories may prove challenging to analyse for antitrust issues. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:24 pm by Doorey
Teachers Federation and prohibited collective bargaining over a variety of matters in the future. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Leyendecker & Lemire
If the invention as described and claimed in a patent application was also found to be new (novel) and not an obvious derivation from that which was already known, then a patent would issue. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
And in the Associated Press, Mark Sherman remarks on the relationship between Trump and Chief Justice John Roberts, noting that although the president-elect “had harsh words for the leader of the federal judiciary” during the campaign, “Trump could need Roberts’ vote on matters ranging from immigration to health care to environmental regulations. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Ritholtz’s decision quotes the definition of fiduciary relationship found in commentary to the Restatement [Second] of Torts § 874 as one that “exists between two persons when one of them is under a duty to act for or to give advice for the benefit of another upon matters within the scope of the relation. [read post]