Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 3281 - 3300 of 14,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am by INFORRM
That people can go back on what they have said they will do in letters. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
  The court then prefaced its analysis of the issues in the case by explaining that it reviews the order granting or denying the motion to strike de novo. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Michael Erdle
Elk Valley Coal Partnership v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm by Jonathan Brun
Secondly, they said that the whole concept that Rylands is meant to protect people from hazardous neighbours is wrong, that if the legislature wants such a rule, they have to adopt it, that the only thing the Rylands rule protects people against is people doing things in the wrong places. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am by Mark Summerfield
As I recently (tentatively) predicted, on Friday 30 July 2021 Justice Beach in the Federal Court of Australia handed down a judgment giving Australia the dubious honour of becoming the first country in the world to legally recognise a non-human as a valid inventor on a patent application: Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
History was made on June 26, 2020, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in R. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:31 am by Morris Turek
  Granted, Travelers has been using its umbrella logo for 50 years in connection with insurance services and the logo has certainly become well-recognized by consumers throughout the United States. [read post]