Search for: "People v. House" Results 3281 - 3300 of 11,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
It’s clearly a vast improvement over the version of the bill that passed out of the House.1 It would also be an improvement over current law. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm by Elijah Griffen
Plaintiffs can demonstrate this by proffering evidence of policies and procedures ensuring the sober living home serves or will serve people with actual disabilities (as well as evidence of adherence to these policies and procedures), such as admissions criteria and house rules. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:29 am
New York City Housing Authority, defendant-respondent NEW YORK COUNTYTorts Wrongful Death Claim by Executor Stayed Pending Resolution of Criminal Action Against Brother Keller v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:08 am by J
It comprised two blocks of flats and two coach houses. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:08 am by J
It comprised two blocks of flats and two coach houses. [read post]
5 Jan 2006, 10:19 am
United States in Light of Wilkinson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am by ASAD KHAN
Notably, despite the existence of four judgments in the Court of Appeal, no House of Lords or Supreme Court authority existed on the issues relevant to this appeal. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:03 am by Adam Zanjani
Scarlet v SABAM The SABAM is the Belgian equivalent of PRS, a royalty collecting agency representing music artists. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
Representative Steve King (R-Iowa), one of the bill’s drafters, testified that the bill would expand public access to the courts; although millions of people can watch the Super Bowl, he noted, the Supreme Court decides momentous cases like Bush v. [read post]