Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 19,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
The appeal (Mathena v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:52 am
Yasin v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:31 am
He maintains that property is the one asset that remains one of the best inflation beating vehicles over the long term. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:11 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am
I figured I would post these thoughts, more for discussion than anything else.So here is another long, geeky post (almost embarrassingly long) about scholarship and legal doctrine. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:48 am
In part due to his current health problems, in part to his change of careers, and in part because the district court judge simply thought that was the case, saying: "I've been doing this long enough and I can tell, I think, when people are genuine . . . . [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 1:00 am
If the boot is on the other foot ie you are the parent returning the children late: A simple apology may go a long way. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 9:53 pm
DeJoy and Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm
” That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:58 pm
., et al v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Nor do I think this is a First Amendment violation, as it's true that the state is "sponsoring" (in a way) the message, but as long as the party pays the marginal cost of this speech -- which it does -- that's reasonable. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 5:45 am
I wish, frankly, I could try this case in a state like Texas where gun ownership is, I suspect, not viewed as prima facie evidence of criminal intent.I worked with a trial consultant not long ago to prepare for a case. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
And that the opinion will seem pretty clearly right as long as you respond to defendant's best argument in a part of the opinion that most people will skim over rather than respond to it directly.This is also, I might add, how bad law gets created. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:31 am
She recounted how John Tuma could not tell the jury how long it would take the facility to treat even just one truck load of waste water. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:48 am
Even people like Justice Brennan, who would prefer the second requirement to occasionally obviate the need for the first, have signed onto this test.But Judge Bybee concurs exclusively to argue that the second requirement shouldn't matter -- that as long as the defendant has minimum contacts, it shouldn't matter whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction is fair. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:45 am
In People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
Moore v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:50 pm
On the other hand, the Cole memo gave people reason to rely on the thought that the federal law was effectively nullified as long as they operated within certain limits. [read post]
