Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 3281 - 3300 of 15,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm by David Kopel
The states did not argue that the revisions to the Medicaid grant program violate the 4-factor test in S.D. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by Paul M. Hauge
So held the Appellate Division in its recent opinion in New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by Sadie Basila
The Supreme Court held in New Process Steel v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In an original jurisdiction lawsuit, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
Addressing protection first, access later means that creators don't become the victims of their own creations' success, while still being able to take market power and "expectations" into consideration, with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, when someone wants to use someone else's creation. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Virginia Constitution Article V §12, the clemency power, is quite explicit on that point. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:23 am by nflatow
Professor Cole was counsel for the Humanitarian Law Project in Holder v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming Since the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
All are medicines initially approved by the FDA and then later serious problems arose...even recalls....but how many people were injured or killed in the interim? [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:37 pm
On the eve of the 6th Circuit hearing for the ACLU v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 11:25 pm
The issue was that the Local Authority’s decision fell under Para 3 of Schedule 3 to the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, which provides an exception to the exclusion from support of people unlawfully in the UK: Paragraph 1 does not prevent the exercise of a power or the performance of a duty if, and to the extent that, its exercise or performance is necessary for the purpose of avoiding a breach ofâ€â [read post]