Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 3281 - 3300 of 12,211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2019, 1:23 am by Tessa Shepperson
The ‘license’ lets stratagem was knocked on the head by the 1985 case of Street v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
They do know it yet, but some day, perhaps later this year, they will all convene at the United States Courthouse in lower Manhattan go decide whether Blair Davis-Garett was retaliated against by Urban Outfitters for complaining about age discrimination.The case is Davis-Garret v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  TM law says that if people think both would produce, then they’re in the same market. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:43 pm by Michael Connell
  This permitting regime had been the subject of significant litigation, with a Court of Appeal decision in Gilmor v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm by Rosalind Early
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am by Ronald Collins
Hodges (2015), Roberts took exception to the claim of the petitioners’ attorney that her clients were only asking the court to allow “a class of people who are, by state laws, excluded from being able to participate in this institution. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  On 23 December 2012 an exchange took place on Facebook between Mrs Stocker and Mr Stocker’s new partner Deborah Bligh (Mrs Stocker having “reached out” to Ms Bligh on Facebook). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Mr Justice Arnold took the audience through the background of the case and the pleadings from both Sky and SkyKick. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Court of Appeals reinstates an age-harassment and retaliation case.The case is Davis-Garett v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-4 decision that a death-row inmate cannot challenge an execution method that he says will cause him excrutiating pain.The case is Bucklew v. [read post]