Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 3281 - 3300 of 8,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Part 2 covers claims with numerical limits, relevance of the file history, harmonisation, and a vote as to whether the decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly has improved the law. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:47 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
"  Although the standard of review of a trial courts factfinding is one of deference, Cesare v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
” Eccentric commentator Peter Hitchens weighed in with a piece in the Mail on Sunday with the title ““What will women gain from all this squawking about sex pests? [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
As illustrated most recently in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 5:11 pm by Peter Ling
Peter LingThe “representative” registered with the Swiss Patent Register for the Swiss part of a European patent does not constitute a legal representative within the meaning of the Code of Civil Procedure. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 6:20 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
Georgios Katalagarianakis, European Commission The Safe-by-Design Concept and its relevance across sectors — Blanca Suarez-Merino, Peter Weiersmüller, Karl Höhener, TEMAS AG Safe by Design: Long term legal and corporate social responsibility impacts — Anthony Bochon, Squire Patton Boggs (UK) LLP Session 2:  Tools and Frameworks for Product Development Available for Safe by Design Combined slides: Single file containing introduction, Stoffenmanager-Nano, LICARA… [read post]
Super Lawyers named Chicago and Oak Brook business trial attorneys Peter Lubin and Vincent DiTommaso Super Lawyers in the Categories of Class Action, Business Litigation, and Consumer Rights Litigation. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:00 am by Bryan Camp
For the substance of the case, see Peter Reilly’s great post... [read post]