Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 3281 - 3300 of 6,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Winters: it fits in the theme b/c it’s a conversation, but agrees it’s different. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
There were also against firearms sales to the insane, or to persons who were intoxicated. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
Any argument that Second Life could be protected under Section 230(c) of the Common Decency Act of 1996 must be tempered by the S.D.N.Y. opinion in Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
  Both of these issues framed the Appellate Division's recent unpublished opinion in Bove v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
"The judge’s interpretation was upheld by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 1 December 2011 in Joined Cases C-446/09 and C-495/09 [reviewed by the IPKat here].After nearly two years of the EU legislative process, the Committee of Permanent Representatives of the EU agreed, on 10 June 2015, the final compromise text of the Council of the European Union on the proposal for a new EU Regulation on the (to be renamed) EU Trade Mark, which includes… [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Deduction for State and local general sales taxes (sec. 164(b)(5))31. 15-year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements, qualified restaurant buildings and improvements, and qualified retail improvements (secs. 168(e)(3)(E)(iv), (v), (ix), 168(e)(7)(A)(i), (8))32. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
AE’s position was that L&S could not establish (a) and (c). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Nader Hasan
During Canada Revenue’s Agency (CRA) review of the transaction, the CRA requested production of the memorandum pursuant to its powers under the Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp). [read post]