Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 3281 - 3300 of 41,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
As noted here on The IPKat, the stated objectives of the proposed Act to “…(a) protect the rights of authors to ensure just rewards and recognition for their intellectual efforts; (b) provide appropriate limitations and exceptions to guarantee access to creative works; (c) facilitate Nigeria’s compliance with obligations arising from relevant international copyright treaties and conventions; and (d) enhance the capacity of the Nigerian Copyright Commission for… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:13 pm by Xandra Kramer
TikTok requested the Court to refer preliminary questions to the CJEU but the Court refused this request, stating that the questions on (a) how the GDPR and Brussels I-bis Regulation regimes interact and (b) the applicability of Article 79(2) GDPR were deemed resolved. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As relevant here, the current version of the prohibition states:(A) Subject to the exceptions provided in part (B), whoever knowingly enters a sensitive place while carrying a firearm shall be guilty of a felony punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 and imprisonment for up to five years. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Seventeen states allow local income taxes in addition to state-level personal income taxes. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
In those circumstances B may have an action against A. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
Hacked Off reminds readers that the Leveson system is not “state approved”. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am by Nedim Malovic
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488), states that… [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:53 am by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal considered itself bound by R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee (2002) EWCA Civ 276 in this, as authority that: If a notice is addressed to A (by his correct name) and sent to A’s proper address, it cannot be treated as a notice given to B. [read post]