Search for: "State v. Code" Results 3281 - 3300 of 27,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
There has been much more legislative action at the state level, however, particularly in conservative states. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Stated otherwise, not only do compelled speech objections to directives about pronouns and titles largely sidestep the reality that courtrooms are already places of highly regulated speech, they are also taken up by some to disguise an underlying discriminatory ideology. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:58 am by Stephen Griffin
  States could condition receipt of further assistance on compliance with a code of pregnancy regulation. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
This is the first revision of the Code since its introduction in 2013. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia federal court, McCarthy Building Companies Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm by Ilya Somin
  As noted in my last post about today's Supreme Court ruling in in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:29 pm
En effet, il revenait au premier juge, en tant qu’autorité judiciaire compétente aux fins d’exécution (art. 45 al. 2 CDPJ – Code de droit privé judiciaire vaudois du 12 janvier 2010 ; BLV 211.002), de contrôler que les conditions d’application de la CLaH 70 étaient remplies. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:54 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey The Texas Supreme Court has granted petition for review of a 2019 decision in Dyer et al v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:31 pm by Jonathan Pyzer
The word “intentionally” in the Code has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean “not done by accident or through honest mistake” (R v Bernard, 1988 SCR 833). [read post]