Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 27,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 9:15 am
Futrell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 11:06 am
Fair lending. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
And cost a fair penny. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
Related Issues: NSA SpyingRelated Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 5:10 am
Higueros v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:20 am
The ECtHR also found violations of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty) and of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial). [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
The majority held that when “an owner undertakes a fair evaluation and enters in Contract B on the terms set out in the tender documents, Contract A is fully performed” (para 71). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Justice v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
Justice v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Justice v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:45 pm
After a three-week jury trial, Southern New England Telephone Company has won a verdict finding that employees who were titled as field managers and classified as exempt, were in fact exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state law. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 1:58 pm
Recently, the New Hampshire Supreme Court case (State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:43 am
The Supreme Court recently clarified the meaning of “changing clothes” under Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act in Sandifer v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:20 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:54 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
There has been some discussion, for example, about whether or not there needs to be an equal number of check boxes on each side (favoring fair use v. disfavoring fair use) in order for the checklist to itself be fair. [read post]
