Search for: "State v. Laws"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 156,305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2016, 7:53 am
In Fischer v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:42 am
Juvenile law is one area where there are definite differences between Nebraska and South Dakota. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:47 am
, Holding: A defendant is subject to the highest mandatory minimum specified for his conduct in 18 U.S.C. 924(c) unless another provision of law directed to conduct proscribed by Section 924(c) specifically imposes an even greater mandatory minimum sentence. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Kendrick v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 11:51 am
Very interesting opinion issued today in US V. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Even if the votes could be found to pass such a law, it is not clear that it would be upheld by a court that has now returned this issue to the states. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 1:40 am
State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:35 pm
State (McGirt v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:05 am
Roe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
As the faculty advisor to the Alabama Law Review, I'm delighted to note that the Law Review today is hosting a symposium on the 50th anniversary of New York Times v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:27 am
Debuting on line today is volume 37:1 of the NYU Review of Law & Social Change, a symposium issue dedicated to Perry v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 3:14 pm
But that is the law and there is nothing that distinguishes the result here from the results in the raft of authorities that have stated and restated and applied that law for more than 100 years. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 4:41 am
And the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:21 am
In Durden v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:50 am
In Cameron v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:14 am
The latest in this series of cases is the judgment of the Andhra High Court in Muralidhar Rao v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
[3] Ware v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:06 am
Constitution's 14th Amendment (No state shall deny to any person the equal protection of the laws), rather than the federal civil rights statute.This brilliant legal maneuver was permissible because Ms. [read post]
