Search for: "State v. May" Results 3281 - 3300 of 120,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
LEXIS 57 (April 6, 2010): [*P16] While our state constitution may provide greater protections than the United States Constitution, State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am by Paul Horwitz
Given similar concerns about identifying "religion," "churches," and "the press," it may be that church-state scholars can and will have something to add to thinking and writing about the Press Clause. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:37 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
While the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court may doubt the existence of the CSI Effect, it recently ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
" It also states that "Lessors and Lessee agree that the holding in the case of Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Had the state just banned condoms or the pill, it's hard to imagine a different outcome.Maybe a harder case would be presented if the state offered a health justification for the ban. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Federal RFRA May Not Be Used to Disable State Law Long before Hobby Lobby was decided, in 1997, the Supreme Court held that RFRA was unconstitutional in Boerne v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Neuman, 93 AD2d 745, 746 [1st Dept 1983] (account stated established by receiving and retaining bills without any timely objection); Liddle O’Connor, Finkelstein & Robinson v Koppelman, 215 AD2d 204 [1st Dept 1995] (account stated based only on partial payment); Bracken & Margolin, LLP v Schambra, 270 AD2d 221 [2d Dept 2000] (account stated based on retention of invoices without… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am by Rebecca Griffiths, Olswang
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]