Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 61,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2018, 12:03 pm
All summer we have been talking about the fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:01 pm
The issue in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 10:46 am
– Alexis The post Useful Info During COVID (v. 5) appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm
United States Police Need Warrant to Search Arrestee’s Cell Phone in Most Cases – Riley v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm
As USA Today reported, prosecutors are having a difficult time getting convictions on cases of DUI involving prescription drugs because state laws have limited means to prove a person is impaired. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Ctr. for Food Safety v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 1:47 pm
Ocean State Tactical, LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:57 am
You can find the two court filings below.United States et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:59 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:38 am
WeChat Users Alliance v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:25 pm
Additional Resources: Easier Holiday Travel Tips, Nov. 25, 20915, South Florida Times More Blog Entries: Shively v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:19 am
” Faculty Senate of Florida International University, et. al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 8:40 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
In the new case, United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 2:16 am
The Supreme Court held that Secretary of State’s insistence on it being necessary for the supporter to be present at the engagement would stand in the way of means of support which do not involve physical presence and would be likely to impede attempts to improve the claimant’s abilities to handle matters in future with less support. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:29 am
Azcarate to release copies of transcripts relating to the Depp v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm
Virginia State Board of Elections with another race-and-redistricting case, Cooper v. [read post]
