Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 29,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 11:24 am
But across half the states, 36 million people are in danger of losing that right after the Supreme Court’s shameful decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
The Revised Project’s approval was upheld on Petitioners’ two subsequent administrative appeals to the Planning Commission and City Council. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:03 am
In the one case on this topic, McPherson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:31 am
United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
Under Section 111(d), each state must submit a plan that establishes standards of performance for any existing source and provides for their implementation and enforcement.EPA regulations. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
The case is Torres v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
Does the Supreme Court’s decision in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
In the wake of Dobbs, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
" Alden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:51 am
While plaintiff said she will visit the state once the Covid crisis is over, "those plans are no more definite than the plans of the respondent in Lujan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
Indeed, similar rules apply in many states to private schools more generally; if a state bans discrimination in admission by such schools, which many states do, that brings with it similar restrictions on speech that creates a "hostile environment" (which would likely violate the First Amendment when applied to curriculum, see Runyon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
“[P]rivity, or a relationship approaching privity, exists between the personal representative of the estate planning attorney” (Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309 [2010]). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
As previously reported, last month the Iowa Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood of Heartland, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:17 am
That opinion overturned Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:47 pm
At bottom, the Clean Power Plan essentially adopted a cap-and-trade scheme, or set of state cap-and-trade schemes, for carbon. [read post]
