Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 57,174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 7:26 am
Last year, former GuestKat Jan Jacobi reported both the Warsaw District Court’s Referral to the CJEU and AG Rantos’ Opinion on the TB v Castorama Polska and Knor litigation (see IPKat posts here and here). [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:00 am
Interestingly, the EU doesn’t mention the United States, which is arguably the most significant country yet to implement an effective site-blocking regime. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:40 pm
And, as I noted earlier, Walter Nixon v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Reflecting on the opinion in Outside In, Guido explains: “My compromise was one that said, ‘You can have local establishments, locally defined identities, so long as you do it in a way that also states that your place is open to everybody. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm
National Association of State Departments of Agriculture CEO Ted McKinney said its impact will be on states and farmers. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:29 pm
That was Chief Justice Roberts channeling his inner Milton Hirsch in Tyler v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Murphy said he thought Ambassador Tai was “too nice” to be a good negotiator for the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 3:00 pm
On June 7, 2022, the court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law, holding, in relevant part, that (1) Marfield and Shanara are in default under the loan agreements; and (2) the Lenders’ preferred ship mortgages related to said default outrank Grupo R’s state-created liens arising from Grupo R’s attachment of the MAYA and MARANGO under Texas state law. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:33 am
Innovative Solutions Consulting LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:07 am
Delivering a decision in Sackett v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:22 am
" The only case on the subject, Perry v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
" In Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of Sara Salerno, Petitioner v Dermot F. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of Sara Salerno, Petitioner v Dermot F. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications, Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with Plaintiff at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications, Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with Plaintiff at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
