Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 6,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis, heard 21-23 July 2015. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 10:48 pm
., LLC, filed an appeal for zoning variances with the board seeking: to permit lot coverage of 40 percent, where 40 percent already existed and 30 percent was permitted; to permit a first floor grocery net floor area of 4366 square feet, where 2446 square feet already existed and 1500 square feet was permitted; to permit the construction of a conforming building addition to the nonconforming building; and to permit twenty-four outdoor seats where fifteen were permitted. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:20 am
Robins and Campbell Ewald Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
Lovvorn v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am
In King v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:02 pm
In Composite Technology International, Inc v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
The interview took place over the summer at the Supreme Court in Lord Mance’s office, which overlooks Parliament Square. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:33 pm
Maryland Casualty v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:33 pm
Maryland Casualty v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis, heard 21-23 July 2015. [read post]
Ninth Circuit’s Pro-PAGA Decision Is Not the Death Knell for Class Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
1 Oct 2015, 7:34 pm
The decision appears contrary to the United States Supreme Court holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:39 pm
R. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:43 am
See, Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
Defend Our Waterfront v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:55 am
However, its purported failure to contact her to procure employment after she reported the harassment plausibly violated Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision with respect to employment agencies (Deeter v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
