Search for: "State v. State"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 258,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 7:11 am
On March 31, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided Armstrong v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:01 am
State Farm filed its promised post-judgment motion in Broussard v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:34 am
If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm
Is a defendant entitled, upon request, to an instruction expressly informing the jury that the State has the burden of proving each element of every charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt and did the lower court err in refusing to give the requested instruction? [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am
Criminal Trial in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:10 am
State. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:36 am
In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:36 am
Today is the first Monday in October, and the first case up on the SCOTUS docket is Kahler v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
In Alleyne v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:30 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carr v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:47 am
Death not ‘adverse effect' Regina (British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “The death of an animal used in a regulated procedure for scientific experimentation was not an adverse effect which needed to be taken into account when deciding whether to grant a licence for such experiments. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AF and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 64; [2008] WLR (D) 00; [2008] WLR (D) 325 “The removal of a foreign national from the United Kingdom was unlawful, as incompatible with the United Kingdom’s obligations under art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, if it would amount to a flagrant breach of her right to respect for her family life so as to… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:54 am
R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2008] UKHL 63; [2008] WLR (D) 00; [2008] WLR (D) 328 “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within art 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms but it was lawful as it could… [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:45 pm
Lenovo (United States) Inc. [read post]
