Search for: "State v. Tech" Results 3281 - 3300 of 5,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
United States, 848 F.2d 362, 364 [2d Cir1988] ). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm by Florian Mueller
Shortcomings should be addressed and I hope Democrats will be principled enough to do that in certain states. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 5:54 am by Elina Saxena
He also suggested that “encryption has become the Donald Trump of tech issues. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Reasonable suspicion" is not required under Texas law except for physical mobile tracking devices like those at issue in US v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
The same can also be said of South Africa's Patent Act (in particular, see Chapter V).Indeed, the global authority on the $500 billion dollar moto taxi industry is feeling smug has done well with its patent strategy and media publicity. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Burton v. iYogi, Inc., 2015 WL 4385665, No. 13–CV–6926 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
FAS Techs., Inc., 138 F.3d 1448, 1454 (Fed. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
To quote Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher in their last WSJ column, “In taking a page from the tech industry .. it was once again time to refresh, reimagine, remake and reinvent” the regulation of environmental matters. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The draft law compels tech platforms like Google and Facebook to remove harmful content, but includes protection for news-related material. [read post]