Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 3281 - 3300 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 7:09 am
In the decision of Hirshfield v Schwartz, One neighbor in Bel-Air mistakenly encroached on the other neighbor's property in installing a strong block wall in front, and in the rear, extensive underground water and electrical lines, and several motors (for the pool and waterfall) underground in a concrete and iron enclosure. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:07 am by Jill
  The United States Supreme Court held in Palmore v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:16 pm
Although a limited amount of recreational marijuana is legal in some states now, including Illinois, there are still many drugs that are considered illegal in the state. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Amy Teng
Amy Teng is an assistant attorney general in the Washington Attorney General’s Office, which joined 22 other states and the District of Columbia on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am by Jonathan Metzer
Image: Flickr.com   R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 In a nutshell The Government’s flagship scheme to deport foreign criminals first and hear their appeals later was ruled by the Supreme Court to be incompatible with the appellants’ right to respect for their private and family life (reversing the decision below). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
Those Israeli voices have a fresh, strong argument for why exercising restraint and lifting the siege are not only morally right and legally necessary, but eminently in Israel’s interest. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am by Greg Mersol
  While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:03 am by John Jascob
Filing a joint amicus brief with AARP in the case of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]