Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 4,641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
The inventor-friendly principles that governed the original United States Patent Office back when Thomas Jefferson ran it (though he personally wasn’t too much a fan of patents) are still the law today, even though the scope of prior art in most industries has expanded far beyond the point where any patent examiner could reasonably review it, much less ensure an inventor in an ex parte proceeding fairly describes it. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
During the time that she lived at Betty Shabazz Village, Davis worked at the United States Attorney's Office and the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
United States Fidelity & Guar. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:47 am
It flat prohibits the expenditure of any funds appropriated under the NDAA to move a detainee from GTMO to the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:18 pm
Corporate VeilIt is as easy to state that the origin of the separate entity principle is often traced to Salomon v Salomon as it is difficult to outline when a court will lift the veil. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
" That seems pretty clear, since Section 2412 says that it does not "alter[ ], modif[y], repeal[ ], invalidate[ ], or supersede[ ] any other provision of Federal law which authorizes an award of such fees and other expenses to any party other than the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm
Holder on January 18, 2012, confirmed that owners of certain copyrighted works authored outside of the United States can continue to enjoy restored protection under U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:47 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:47 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:38 pm
The Court held that the Rendine decision permitting attorney fee enhancements remains valid and has not been altered by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Perdue v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:49 am
The Court altered its analysis of what a Fourth Amendment search was in Katz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
[Husband] is an O-3 in the United States Navy. [read post]
