Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 13,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc.), and one in California state court (Garcia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
Agencies have been admonished by the California Supreme Court against early commitments to projects in advance of environmental review (Save Tara v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
The court in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm
Fourth, "in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:26 am
In a post at the PBS NewsHour’s The Rundown blog, Spencer Michels examines California’s response to Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of OhioOpinion Date: 9/26/11Cite: Office Depot, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:50 am
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of California abused its discretion when it refused to award a victorious patent plaintiff a permanent injunction where the patentee directly competes with the infringer. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:43 pm
The case addresses the immigration consequences of removal and deportation of immigrants from the United States for minor possession of marijuana. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
V. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
The NLRB did not apply the United States' Supreme Court's holding in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Though some posts refer to California wines produced by his employer, those wines are commercially available throughout the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
This morning at 9:30, the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District will hear oral argument in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
Justice Mihara dissents.The majority opinion contains the following opening paragraph:"The sole issue in this appeal is whether "the role of the jury [is] diminished and eroded in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution" by the use of juvenile adjudications to increase the maximum punishment for an offense, in light of the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Apprendi v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
As a result of the Court’s ruling today in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
As a result of the Court’s ruling today in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
