Search for: "United States v. Dollar"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 4,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
" Background United States Patent No. 5,490,216, assigned to Uniloc, relates to "a software registration system to deter copying of software. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
" Background United States Patent No. 5,490,216, assigned to Uniloc, relates to "a software registration system to deter copying of software. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Supreme Court, and another in Ohio state court. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
., a church in which, as the United States Supreme Court expressed it in its 1872 decision in Watson v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm
Senator Michael Bennett (D-Colo.) introduced a bill that would establish a federal watchdog to regulate “Big Tech”—the largest technology companies in the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Hamlet Condominium Ass’n v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
The DOL rule, “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States,” takes effect immediately on publication (October 8, 2020). [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
The DOL rule, “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States,” takes effect immediately on publication (October 8, 2020). [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
Justice David Souter, writing the majority opinion for the United States Supreme Court, upheld Exxon's liability for the incident, but found the $2.5 billion excessive. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Here is the decision, B.C.T.F. v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:00 pm
See Sav-On Drug Stores v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
CalPERS explained that the recent federal district court decision (State of California v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Bellotti (1978), set the legal-ideological stage for SCOTUS’s landmark decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
A California District Court upheld a school’s decision to prevent students wearing the flag on their T shirts on Cinco de Mayo (a day of Mexican celebration across the United States when the Mexican flag is often worn). [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]
