Search for: "United States v. John" Results 3281 - 3300 of 11,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2006, 3:59 pm
Respondents also counter the standards proposed by petitioner and the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
  It is one thing for an issuer to opine that it is "a leading exporter of widgets" and quite another for it to opine that it is "the leading exporter of widgets in the United States by units shipped". [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:54 am by Paras Shah
As the Supreme Court’s opinion last term in Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:24 am by Venkat
The banks submitted affidavits demonstrating that they had no activity or customers in the United States, and therefore they should not be subject to personal jurisdiction in the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Hayley Evans
Mattis on the government’s proposed transfer of John Doe. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm by admin
Kennedy while president of the United States in Dallas, Texas 1963. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:01 am by Dale Carpenter
Unlike the Court, Carpenter revels in the factual details and the personalities involved in the struggle, as he takes us from the recesses of a private bedroom in a seedy condominium on the outskirts of Houston to the oral argument in the grand chamber of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
However, the threat that ISIS sympathizers and other terrorists posing as refugees could seek admission to the United States as a means to commit terrorist acts is very real. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am by Jay Willis
” Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood speculates on who may be writing the four opinions remaining from the October sitting; among his predictions is that either Justice Kennedy or Justice Stevens will write the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]