Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 7,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2015, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:33 pm
Once again, Jones v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:51 pm
Calabrese conceded that this intrusion may have been minor, but cited Boyd v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:00 am
The Court held that the statutory limitations on Workers’ Compensation attorney’s fees created by the Florida Legislature violated the Due Process clause of both the Florida and United States Constitutions. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:13 am
” Ever since Allen v State Board of Elections (1969) the VRA (sections 2 and 5) have been the “go to” weapon in any savvy plaintiff’s arsenal to attack partisan maps that target minority representation and political voting power for dilution. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:56 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Much like the fact that almost 150 years after the ratification of the 13th Amendment the United States still struggles to annihilate human trafficking and slavery within its borders, most Americans are unaware of the history of eugenics and forced sterilization in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Much like the fact that almost 150 years after the ratification of the 13th Amendment the United States still struggles to annihilate human trafficking and slavery within its borders, most Americans are unaware of the history of eugenics and forced sterilization in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
The Court accepted that, in any kind of suit, §337(a) restricts the ability of a plaintiff to pursue a theory that turns on claimed FDCA violations:Section 337(a) of the FDCA bars private enforcement of the statute, stating that “all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this [Act] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943), and Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:57 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
In Peckingham v North Carolina, the United States Supreme Court in its spring 2017 session unanimously set aside a statute providing that registered sex offenders may not access social media sites. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” State of Maryland v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am
Union members are in the minority. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:31 pm
In United States v. [read post]
