Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 29,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
” This Court interpreted the Constitution’s grant of admiralty jurisdiction to the Federal Judiciary as “the power to . . . dispose of a case as justice may require. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
” If the justices suggested such a distinction in Locke v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
As well as a fairly comprehensive review of the relevant provisions and deadlines for motions to compel.You'll also view some fairly strong language by Justice Robie regarding the conduct of Judge Saiers (in San Joaquin County) as well as counsel for the parties below. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
On Wednesday, January 11, the Court will hear oral argument in Coleman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
On June 21, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled in Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
Anderson and Trump v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
Scindhia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:40 am
June 26 was a big day: Not just the SCOTUS opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:04 am
” In a statement of “basics” that is a joy to us criminal law teachers – because the Court has not really addressed the topic since Standefer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:50 am
Justices Sotomayor and Kagan recused themselves, and Justice Gorsuch did not participate because he was not on the Court when the case was argued. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:20 am
v=IPFExoEL_20&feature=youtu.be Official blurb below… How has lockdown affected the Family Court? [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument in the AEP v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:52 pm
The petition in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:30 pm
Both Scott v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
On February 27, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
In Drummond v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:33 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
Well Rule 42 was adopted by the Supreme Court, so that is not a direct delegation by Congress. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Although the access to justice crisis is now well recognized among stakeholders in the Canadian justice system, a knowledge gap continues to exist regarding the degree of inadequacy in access to justice in Canada – the nature and level of unmet legal needs in Canada and elsewhere are not well understood nor comprehensively researched. [read post]