Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 3281 - 3300 of 3,648
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
Continuing in catch up mode, On Monday The Supreme Court agreed to hear District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 4:58 pm
  A District Court ruled in favor of the estate, but the Fifth Circuit reversed. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
In the new  DNA evidence case, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP finance) What a concept: sharing new inventions with the world is good for the inventor (Techdirt) Global - Copyright On verifying the Commons (Creative Commons) Australia High Court rules on contributory patent infringement: Northern Territory v V Collins & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) Valuating IP: reputation in trade marks and section 60 evidence? [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:42 pm
To give you a sense of how extreme this trend has become, consider these statistics from Galanter's paper: In 1962, 11.5 percent of all civil dispositions filed in U.S. district courts went to trial; by 2002 that figure had dropped to 1.8 percent. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:19 pm
  A District Court ruled in favor of the estate, but the Fifth Circuit reversed. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Anthony, No. 071670 Conviction and sentence for evading federal income tax are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the district court's willful blindness instruction was erroneous; and 2) the district court abused its discretion when it refused to admit into evidence legal materials on which defendant claimed to have relied in forming his good-faith belief that he did not have a duty to pay taxes. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Both cases were removed to federal district court and consolidated for trial. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
  In 1896, the Supreme Court weighed in once again on the question of race in Plessy v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Oct. 3, 2008), the court (Judge William Alsup) wrote this about the CLRA's pre-filing notice requirement: California courts require "strict" compliance with Section 1782. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 4:45 am
Massachusetts District Court Judge William Young entered the... [read post]