Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 3301 - 3320 of 19,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Andrew Frisch
 The current regulation has previously been upheld by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Long Island Care at Home, LTD. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am by John Elwood
United States (involving the prosecution of the former Virginia governor), Kelly v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:09 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
The hospital's contract with Medicare has no such mandatory billing policy as it apparently does with United HealthCare, and therefore given that Medicare was in fact the primary payer in this case, the hospital's election is governed by Medicare law and not state contract law. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 7:55 pm
Bill Posner (not Richard Posner) writes a rather interesting article about the now infamous banner at the center of Morse v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
The States' first argument is that neither Article V of the Constitution nor 1 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm by WIMS
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:00 am
TortTalkers may recall a previous Tort Talk post on the case of Cost v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm by National Indian Law Library
* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured:In re K.T. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
Chmurynski, et al. (303 Conn. 676 (2012)) and a related 2012 bill, HB 5502. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am by Steve Bainbridge
According to the AP, Herbert signed a pair of bills into law that supporters hope will spark similar legislation throughout the West. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
That’s not how it’s supposed to work [my Free State Notes on a Maryland “cyberbullying” bill] Local laws requiring government contractors to disclose/disclaim ties to the anti-Israel BDS movement have rightly come under criticism. [read post]