Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
On April 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 4:54 pm
The Court granted leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
A current case that foreshadows this is the decision in Garcia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
(People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2025, 4:37 pm
Where, as in this case, they are not, a claimant may seek to persuade the Court that people acquainted with him would nevertheless understand the publication to refer to him (‘ordinary reference’), or that readers with knowledge of particular facts, would do so (‘innuendo reference’). [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
Does 1-4, Atlantic v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
On June 12, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am
It's good for the people who were libeled. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
"Behind Supreme Court's Obamacare Case, A Secretive Society's Hidden Hand; For more than 30 years, the Federalist Society has worked behind the scenes to shape Supreme Court outcomes to a conservative agenda; In King v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:11 am
In Apple v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 1:53 pm
Ruling in the case of People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Hart, Jr, (describing Perry v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
No wonder people continue to seek tort reform. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:52 am
Case citation: Margolies v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:12 am
You don't see a lot of pure free speech cases, involving people who are trying to assemble or speak out in public but prevented from doing so by the government. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 11:16 am
[Philip Hamburger on How to Understand this Free Speech Case ] Philip Hamburger asked me to post these FAQs about Murthy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
Although much of the case law referred to (including Buscarini & Ors v San Marino (1999) 30 EHRR 208) concerned the freedom not to hold religious rather than political beliefs, the principles expressed in those cases applied in this instance. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 8:47 am
In a decision issued in September 2008, a Connecticut Superior Court judge ruled in the case of Dornfried v. [read post]
