Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 3301 - 3320 of 112,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 8:04 am by Robert Wood
  In doing so, the court noted that "termination of at-will employment does not invalidate a restrictive covenant and it does not give rise to a claim for constructive discharge. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:38 am by admin
In exploring the legislative history of § 3E1.1, the court in Divens found that the government does not possess the same wide discretion afforded under §5K1.1 in deciding whether to move for an additional one-level departure. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
It is true that the affidavit evidence before the court regarding the faxing of invoices concerning the counterclaim cattle does put the corporate defendant in an unfavourable light. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:10 am
If the law does not support the facts alleged, the defendant may have the opportunity to file a peremptory exception of no cause of action. [read post]
It might also be possible to discredit the evidence that is used against the defendant in a tax fraud case. [read post]
It might also be possible to discredit the evidence that is used against the defendant in a tax fraud case. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The E&O policy further states that the exclusion does not apply “unless there is a finding or adjudication in any proceeding of such conduct. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:28 pm
While this Court does not ultimately issue an opinion regarding whether the Government used excessive force, in order not to bind the Court handling the civil dispute, the Court does find that the Government had probable cause to use special entry procedures. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:30 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  While the holding may be considered groundbreaking by some LGBT advocates, the case does not represent a fundamental change in law from the perspective of Florida employers. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am by MBettman
The plain language of R.C. 2941.51(D) does not require a trial court to make an explicit finding regarding whether the defendant has, or reasonably may be expected to have, the ability to pay court-appointed counsel fees. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:50 am
And you better be glad somebody does because that's what puts the justice in the justice system. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:42 am by Joe Hall
As a non-lawyer, I wonder if it's possible to represent an owner as a John Doe with an affidavit of ownership of an affected domain name submitted. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:53 pm
August 20, 2008): As the district court properly concluded, Reed's case does not fall within the ambit of Randolph. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:11 am
Seems like a basic question: Does the "emergency doctrine" need to be pled as an affirmative defense? [read post]