Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 3301 - 3320 of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Bragg Creek v Tyco Integrated 2019 ABQB 226 https://t.co/zZ0mEsFTxp 2019-04-05 Letter to the Copyright Office on IT modernization status in light of the Fourth Estate decision https://t.co/uF1oGnu5Qk 2019-04-05 Case Law: Stocker v Stocker, Supreme Court overturns Judge on meaning of “tried to strangle” https://t.co/YOOlp3CNSc 2019-04-05 Open Banking & Data Ownership https://t.co/gLrAvzpLjW 2019-04-05 Blogger’s Screenshot of a Newspaper Page Qualifies as Fair… [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
China therefore has found itself persistently reliant on a region that theUnited States continues to dominate, and its investments have been steady for decades.Chinese strategic thinkers see the Middle East as a place with far more peril than promise.The region has a history of both intra-regional strife and domestic unrest, and China is concernedthat extremist ideologies originating in the region will infect western China. [read post]
But Trump’s Nov. 15 announcement that he would be seeking the presidency again clearly was the dominant factor. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am by Erik J. Heels
Tam’ case below.http://thettablog.blogspot.com/2017/06/uspto-issues-new-examination-guideline.html * Matal v. [read post]
In rejecting this argument, the court stated clearly that “the beholdenness or dominance of any director is irrelevant because there is no fear that the dominating director, without a personal or adverse interest, will do anything contrary to the best interest of the company and its stockholders. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The new map came after the same panel of federal judges twice found that lines drawn by the GOP-dominated Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by weakening the power of Black voters. [read post]