Search for: "District of Columbia Government, Appeal of"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
The Supreme Court also overruled the pro-government position adopted by the Second Circuit in [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:46 pm
The Court, however, did not settle whether the Amendment operates against any level of government other than the federal government and a federal entity, the District of Columbia. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:32 pm
An undivided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has upheld a new drug testing regulation that requires employers in the aviation, rail, motor carrier, mass transit, maritime and pipeline industries to directly observe every employee who must produce a urine sample for return-to-work and follow-up drug tests. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1998. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Columbia Pictures Industries, 204 F.3d 326 (1/28/00). [read post]
23 May 2009, 10:17 am
A recent decision by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals addressed whether a private right of action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) required a separate act of enabling legislation. [read post]
23 May 2009, 10:17 am
A recent decision by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals addressed whether a private right of action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) required a separate act of enabling legislation. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:19 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a Department of Transportation (DOT) regulation that requires employees who are returning to safety-sensitive duties after having completed a drug treatment program due to failing or refusing to take a drug test, to submit to return to duty and follow up testing under "direct observation" conditions. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
It’s easy – don’t be ‘selfish’ (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Global - Copyright Brazil to submit World Blind Union proposal to WIPO (Michael Geist) WIPO move to address blind access to information: Public Knowledge response to MPAA – Securing human rights does not harm copyright (Public Knowledge) Panel: Public domain fosters innovation, more limitations and exceptions needed (Intellectual Property Watch) Argentina… [read post]
15 May 2009, 11:08 am
“The confidence in the legal system demands that the appeals court regards this is as a conflict of interest, and that means that the appeals court must order a retrial in the district court,” said Eric Bylander, a Gothenburg University legal scholar, told The Local, an English-language news site in Sweden. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
On appeal, the panel majority held that the NYPD could terminate Pappas for his behavior without violating his First Amendment right to free speech. [read post]
14 May 2009, 10:18 am
First, in December, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an order staying the rule. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:40 pm
Solow and Dreier are still appealing the sanctions. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:47 am
But he ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to review the Bush administration’s refusal to allow California, the District of Columbia and 12 other states to set more stringent auto emission standards than those imposed by the federal government. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
” But, only about a year after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on gun rights in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:21 pm
” But, following the lead of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
The primary materials for the post are available on the DU Corporate Governance website. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We blogged about the problems with Guinan here.District of ColumbiaThe very first court to permit medical monitoring absent actual injury was a federal "prediction" of District of Columbia law. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:04 am
The Legal Times recently broke the news that SDNY Judge (and my former Columbia Law School colleague and all-around good guy) Jerry Lynch noted in his response to the Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire regarding his nomination to the 2nd Circuit that he did not seek out a promotion; rather, Sen. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
The opinion written by Judge Rader began: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that later developments in the art may inform the "patentably distinct" determination for double patenting. [read post]
