Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 137,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:14 pm
Dunk v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:44 pm
In 2002, in Zelman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
Culver v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
This column will develop these two perspectives.Easier to DefendSince the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:17 am
V. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:32 am
One of the most venerable cyberlaw questions: is cyberspace a physical place, and does it matter legally? [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland, TV Vest v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:01 pm
New York's Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 2009 NY Slip Op 05062, Decided on June 18, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State's Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and… [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:24 am
" EMG Technology, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 12:04 am
However, the Court concurs with the Accused Parties that same motion practice is not automatically equated with progress in the litigation, and in this case, does not negate the fact that there have been no depositions, no documents exchanged, and, according to the Accused Parties, 'virtually no discovery other than discovery that the accused parties had to engage in related to the prior art.' " Yodlee, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:49 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:49 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
Suppose the Coleman/Franken litigation drags on for several years (as litigation sometimes does). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:34 am
The Second Circuit has held that the Solomon Amendment, which withholds certain federal funding to universities of which any part does not allow military recruiters, does not violate the First Amendment rights of the faculty of a university.The decision in Burt v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:44 am
Obviously he does not rule like the court in Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:55 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 6:43 pm
In her 19 page opinion in Doe v. [read post]
