Search for: "Does 1 - 47"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 4,452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The Court does not believe that a requirement to restrict trading or create an ethical wall in exchange for a seat at the negotiating table places an undue burden on creditors . . . .[10]. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:00 am
The statute does not limit the ability to award child support based on the age of the child. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:29 am
The scope of the protection conferred upon a person to whom Regulation No 343/2003 applies by the rights set out in Articles 1, 18 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights is not wider than the protection conferred by Article 3 of the ECHR 5. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:16 am
Sadly, 47 USC 230 isn't mentioned at all in the opinion, and I fear it was never raised in the lawsuit at all. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
" Id. at 47-49. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
What does, however, emerge clearly from the opinions are four propositions. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
Folks, spending money that one does not have and might not ever have, is deficit spending. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
The Jurisprudence of DignityLeslie Meltzer Henry University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 160, 2011 U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-42 AbstractFew words play a more central role in modern constitutional law without appearing in the Constitution than dignity. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:09 pm
As he was quoted in Episcopal Life on July 1, 2004:Kurt Barnes, the church’s new treasurer, said the facts had won over the skeptics. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:56 am
Facebook will attract "support" that does not necessarily translate to campaign help (campaign volunteers, donations) or votes. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
The report makes eleven recommendations: 1. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
To be sure, Suleiman does raise some fundamental challenges to the government’s detention powers. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm
App. 4th 47 (Cal. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:48 am
I continue to believe that the best counter-arguments to that idea are (1) that criminal membership was not a war crime at Nuremberg (the war-crimes provision of the London Charter does not mention criminal membership; criminal membership was addressed in two separate articles); and (2) that the elements of criminal membership are materially different than the elements of either material support (criminal membership does not require action in support of the criminal… [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
The Board of appeal does so by setting aside or modifying the impugned decision. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm
Sec. 2. 1. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:10 pm
Second, this provision addresses a problem that does not exist. . . . [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:55 pm
" 47:21 — Nancy Reagan embracing Ronald Reagan's casket. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:49 pm
(Compl., ¶ 47). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:06 pm
Another section is similar, but lacks in the intent requirement: It prohibits “permit[ing] any telephone facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited” elsewhere in the statute. 47 U.S.C. 223(b)(1)(B).I’m not sure how advocates of the activity/inactivity distinction will view this statute, but just from a common-sense perspective it looks to me like it regulates inactivity. [read post]
