Search for: "Fail v. State"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 66,291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am
By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 2, 2021, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.9(a)(2) and (5), and the matter was referred to the Honorable Sondra M. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
The appeals court agreed with Father, stating that the trial court erred in their sua sponte order for civil contempt. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
§164.524(a)(1) states: Right of access. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:17 am
" Citing Matter of Gulotta v New York State Thruway Auth., 174 AD3d 1205, the majority of the court, Lynch, J. dissenting, opined that the penalty of termination "is so disproportionate to the offense and shockingly unfair as to constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" under the circumstances. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:17 am
" Citing Matter of Gulotta v New York State Thruway Auth., 174 AD3d 1205, the majority of the court, Lynch, J. dissenting, opined that the penalty of termination "is so disproportionate to the offense and shockingly unfair as to constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" under the circumstances. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
West v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Sissel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
In the absence of a valid protest, any effort to challenge a protestable decision will be dismissed for failing to state a claim on which relief can be granted. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 1:08 pm
Arostegui-Maldonado v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:46 am
In the end, a majority of the panel did not decide which standard was appropriate—because it found that Section 3205 would fail either level of scrutiny. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:28 am
” Ineligible if merely “stating a functional result. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
[1] Colo v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:22 am
In Kinsella v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:57 am
From Day v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:59 am
In Biden v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:45 am
What states cannot do is fail to meet the federal targets entirely, which is why the stringency of the draft rule is so critical to ensuring the entire county rapidly decarbonizes. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
[S]peaking common pro-life views as part of a pregnancy help ministry, or failing to speak the State’s pro-abortion views on hotly disputed issues, is illegal under state law, on pain of crippling fines, injunctions, and attorney fees. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
Accordingly, the obviousness attack based on AU 228 failed. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:00 am
” Sharp v. [read post]
