Search for: "Fish & Wildlife Service" Results 3301 - 3320 of 3,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm by admin
— Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, December 29, 2009 In accordance with Section 122 (h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement concerning the Malone Service Company Superfund Site, Texas City, Galveston County, Texas. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:31 am by gabrielagendreau
Duties include: (1) Providing legal research, analysis, advice and representation to the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and other officials of the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
In reaction to the likely operation of marijuana delivery services within the city limits, the council adopted a new ordinance in 2013 that explicitly banned mobile dispensaries. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
Rally, inter alia, participated in several calls and email exchanges with officials from NMFS, the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), and the Marine Mammal Commission (“MMC”) regarding the issue. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Greg Lambert
So got lots of wonderful pictures of the different fish and wildlife that live there. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed January 28, and later certified for publication on February 16, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate that challenged on CEQA grounds the El Dorado Irrigation District’s (“EID”) decision to undertake its Upper Main Ditch piping project. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 The City prevailed on all issues but the general plan consistency issue pertaining to whether or not the City properly “coordinated” with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service as called for in the planning document. [read post]
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” The Court further distinguished SPAWN as involving a county’s improper reliance on a categorical exemption for construction of single family homes despite the facts that (1) the proposed home at issue “was adjacent to a protected anadromous fish stream and within a stream conservation area … of ‘critical concern’” and (2) the County’s conclusion that no exceptions to the exemption applied relied on “dozens of [proposed] drainage… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Further, despite lack of a guaranteed outcome, the City’s past experience with commonly providing additional regional transit service during special events (e.g., SF Giants games) constituted substantial evidence supporting the measures’ expected efficacy. [read post]