Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc."
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
Judges are supposed to be even handed. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:07 am
Pix Credit International Business Times Three seemingly unconnected stories have circulated in recent days. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:57 am
-Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd 38- Volcan Compañia Minera SA 50- WTK Holdings Bhr 70- AngloGold Ashanti Ltd 94- Ta Ann Holdings Bhr 126- Schweitzer-Mauduit Int and Huabao Intl Holdings Ltd 148- Eni SpA 150- Royal Dutch Shell Plc1 74- Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd 206- Africa Israel Investments Ltd 218- Alliant Techsystems Inc 224- Lockheed Martin Corp 228- Sesa Sterlite 232- Daewoo International Corp, Oil and Natural Gas Corp Ltd, GAIL India Ltd, Korea Gas Corporation and POSCO 236The… [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
(Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg) The Supreme Court has just agreed to hear Packingham v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Continuing the tradition of a unanimous ruling for a first opinion, the decision in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm
Written warnings regarding limitation periods should ideally be delivered by hand or sent usin [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm
A necessary precondition of a strong faculty is that it have first-hand concern with its own membership. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:48 pm
GlassBOX Television Inc. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:43 pm
The final rule set forth: (1) that a requestfor exclusion must be accompanied by evidence that willmeet the statutory test for the exclusion outlined above;and (2) that the EXHR staff would evaluate the evidence andprovide a scientific recommendation to the Commission as towhether the party submitting the request had met thisstatutory test.The Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA),Polaris Industries, Inc., American Suzuki MotorCorporation, Arctic Cat Inc., Bombardier… [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
First, the burden of proof shifted from the plaintiff, who originally had to show each defendant’s share, to the defendants, who had to show their individual shares in order to avoid joint and several liability. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
If the Board sees it, you’re in deep trouble.On the other hand, if the examiner completed the procedural requirements for rejecting a claim, but the claim and reference don’t match up the way the examiner says, then the examiner has met the procedural burden, and you have to make a substantive challenge. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
By Daniel RichardsonDaniels v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm
A version of this article originally appeared on Securities Docket. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
If opinions from the Lone Star State's highest court such as the one just handed down in Scripps NP Operating LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Ass'n, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Plenary Session: Measuring Consumer Confusion in Trademark InfringementFacilitator: Barton Beebe (NYU) Lanham Act: confusion is vaguely defined. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
A: no first hand knowledge.Blake Reid, Angel Antkers, and Susan Miller, Samuelson-Glushko Technology Law and Policy Clinic Jack Lerner (with students Brian Tamsut, Cristen Fletcher, Jovan C. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
According to police, “Racz explained that the razor blades were accidentally spilled or put into the candy bowl he used to hand out candy from. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
