Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
- For EC Member States, according to Allianz v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:27 am
Wizner, written by pro tem judge, Daniel Harris. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
Harris, 908 A.2d 196 (2006), and is designed to provide same-sex couples with the same rights granted to married couples. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 11:46 am
Hammond v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 8:38 pm
Rodearmel, (Rodearmel v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
" Indeed, I'd go further: fans are much less likely to assert claims, because (1) by definition, they like the underlying work, and (2) they have much more reason to fear losing their own authorship status, see, e.g., Anderson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Cabrales and State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 1:56 pm
Harris, __ M.J. ___, Misc. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 388, the Court may appropriately decline to mandate the order of decision that the lower courts must follow, see, e.g., Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
HARRIS AND THE PERILS OF COGNITIVE ILLIBERALISM Dan M. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 2:18 am
Moreover, Harris v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:40 am
Qualified immunity does not insulate all officers from wrongful deaths or other personal injury claims under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
The difference could not be starker - while truth and safety are irrelevant to the ban itself, the new Guidance is all about safety and truth:FDA does recognize, however, the important public health and policy justification supporting dissemination of truthful and non-misleading [information] on unapproved uses of approved drugs and approved or cleared medical devices to healthcare professionals and healthcare entities. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:29 pm
Per Fitzgerald v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
(It's the fun part of Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 9:23 am
The Powelll v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
” Based on these finding, one may ask: does food irradiation represent an opportunity to improve consumer confidence in the safety of fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach? [read post]
