Search for: "High v State"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
On 15 October 2020 Meade J. handed down his first ever written judgment in his new role as a Judge of the High Court in MSD v Wyeth. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
To read, “USPTO Issues Guidance on Mayo v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 6:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
In Koushal v Union of India, two other judges had overturned a Delhi High Court judgment declaring the criminalisation of sodomy to be unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
In Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:03 pm
’ ” Ferreira de Sousa has not met that high standard. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
The words “territorial jurisdiction” as used in this Article and in Article I of the present Convention mean: territory, including territorial waters, and the airspace thereover belonging to or under the control of one of the Contracting Parties, and vessels and aircraft belonging to one of the Contracting Parties or to a citizen or corporation thereof when such vessel is on the high seas or such aircraft is over the high seas. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:21 am
In Boyle v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 12:39 pm
The ACCC has decided that it will not seek special leave to appeal to the High Court (see here). [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm
State Farm Ins. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:33 am
Following the decision of the High Court in Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and others [2020] EWHC 2448 (Comm), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has decided to publish guidance in respect of the evidence and methodologies which policyholders may use to prove the presence of Covid-19. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am
As noted here, in a 2009 opinion in Katz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:21 am
First Solar, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has heard a case known as Sackett v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm
[cross-posted and abridged from Free State Notes, which has more on the Maryland implications] Tags: redistricting reform, Supreme Court, Wisconsin, WO writings Supreme Court will look at partisan gerrymandering is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:08 am
Left unaddressed by the court below, and thus the state high court, was whether the state uniformity law was constitutional (Protect Fayetteville fka Repeal 119 v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
Quinn ruling a year ago, which questioned precedent in Abood v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:58 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:43 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In 2009, a Ninth Circuit panel held (in Nordyke v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:52 am
See, United States v. [read post]
