Search for: "In Interest of Jones"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 7,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 8:01 am
Jones. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:01 am
Jones. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
Wang, the book is co-authored by Jones Day antitrust partners Sebastien Evrard and former MOFCOM official Yizhe Zhang, based in Jones Day’s Hong Kong and Beijing offices, respectively, and associate Baohui Zhang. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 6:42 am
I thought others might be interested in the presentation so I posted the slides. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
In 1999, Doherty J.A. of the Ontario Court of Appeal tried to rebrand “Solicitor-Client Privilege” as “Client-Solicitor Privilege”.[10] It didn’t take; we still put the Solicitor first despite the client’s interests being the raison d’être for the privilege. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
A broader approach could focus on whether the officials interfered with property interests, such as whether a trespass occurred. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Morland-Jones v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:06 am
Jones, 411 U. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:06 am
Jones, 411 U. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:06 am
” And further, that the interest: being valued is the interest of the landlord in default, not the abstract interest of a notional willing buyer. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:43 pm
The majority of five justices that comprised the more conservative wing of the court relied on the intrusion on Jones property interest in having the device installed on his vehicle. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:43 pm
The majority of five justices that comprised the more conservative wing of the court relied on the intrusion on Jones property interest in having the device installed on his vehicle. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:44 pm
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If Elena Kagan, say, is a swing justice in a particular case and if she is responsive to arguments based on the twentieth century canon, both sides will take this into account in framing their arguments – if progressives rely on canonical materials to support their case, conservatives will counter that these materials, when properly construed, actually give new support for their position.What is more, conservatives will often find it in their interest to emphasize the… [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
In this edition, I think the most interesting case (of a number of interesting cases) is United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:01 am
You can read the opinion here.FindLaw has an interesting post with 5 things to know. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:47 am
The May 2014 article, written by John Emmerig of the Jones Day la firm’s Sydney office, is entitled “Securities Class Actions Escalate in Australia” (here). [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:06 pm
Jones, a unanimous Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a person’s car to monitor his movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment (requiring a warrant). [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
One mildly interesting (although inconsequential) construction point did raise its head at the end of the judgment. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
I couldn't ever get anyone interested in renting monster movies, though. [read post]
