Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 3301 - 3320 of 4,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
Below, we discuss the most significant aspects of Elena Kagan’s experience and writings as they relate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:38 pm by Steve Vladeck
It's one thing to take an oath to support a foreign sovereign, or to enlist in the armed forces of a foreign state (that's not even enough, by the way, under Section 1481, unless we're at war with said state). [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
Irvine’s law school joined Kagan on the stage, the three agreed that “Justice Anthony Kennedy’s influential position at the center of this ideological court will only deepen” after Justice Stevens steps down. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:16 am by SHG
"  This is the court's way of saying, "we're not gonna let all those stupid constitutional thingies get in the way when there's he-man police work to be done. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
In essence, agrees with Kennedy that Buono's earlier standing to sue is still in effect for this case.Yes.Yes.What remedy is Buono entitled to if he wins? [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He exemplifies pragmatic, nonpartisan leadership, and we're thrilled to welcome him to City Hall. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
One example (courtesy of Randall Kennedy) is that some people, based on crime statistics, might think African Americans are genetically more likely to be violent, since income and other statistics cannot close the racial gap. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:33 am by charonqc
People are strange Voters are strange when you’re a plonker Reporters look ugly when you’re alone Advisers seem wicked when you’re unwanted Debates are uneven when you’re down When you’re strange Bloggers come out of the rain When you’re strange No-one remembers you’re sane When you’re deranged When you’re deranged When you’re deranged 13 years ago, on… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:34 am by Steve Hall
  The 2008 Supreme Court ruling referenced in the article is Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
  Pointing to a question Justice Kennedy asked during the argument, Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog expresses satisfaction that Kennedy, at least, appeared to accept an “information” interest that may be made in future cases regarding campaign finance disclosure requirements. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am by Matt Sundquist
Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Scalia have all opposed cameras in the Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:09 am by jgabryno
“And most of the flights at Kennedy are international flights. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  But given that there are six opinions and no majority decision at all, the reality of what we're seeing in Salazar v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm by Joe Mullin
Judge Crabb also denied Quanta's motions for a re-trial and for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:49 am by Walter Olson
Things you're missing if you're not following my other blog: Waxman sets hearing tomorrow on proposed CPSIA fix; In debt-collection case Jerman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:12 am by Kashmir Hill
Please don’t pull a Larry Summers on me, CRIMSON DNA We’re a legal blog, not a science blog. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:49 pm by AdamSmith1776
They go all the way, both when they're in vivid, rushing motion and when they're in deep stillness. [read post]