Search for: "In re: Hill" Results 3301 - 3320 of 6,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 7:33 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Meghashyam Mali of The Hill reports. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
You’re paying for what you hope is a greater chance of a better outcome. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm by Kevin Goldberg
 They’re not the only litigants either, as major record labels have filed suit against Sirius XM and against Pandora as well. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm by Eric Alexander
”  What followed was a meeting with the manufacturer, a re-review of the third application by a new team, a second Advisory Panel Meeting, a recommendation from the review team that the device was “not substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicates,” and notification to the manufacturer that prior clearance would be rescinded and the product re-classified to Class III (PMA). [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 11:34 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
 If you’re a non-lawyer and are admitted after passing the exam and meeting the moral character requirements, then you’re a “patent agent” (just not a “patent lawyer”). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:29 am by Joe Mullin
Many lawmakers on Capitol Hill keep coming back to the same solution—blaming Section 230. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 10:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Sometimes the status quo stamps down any new approach on Capitol Hill. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by KC Johnson
(The articles reference 2007 as a starting date for the complaint, although they’re not entirely clear on this point.) [read post]