Search for: "London v. State" Results 3301 - 3320 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, Global Global - General Candidates for post of WIPO Director General present their platforms: (WIPO), IP is not a thing: (Dilanchian), FOSS adoption and consumer welfare: (IPcentral) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Manufacturers becoming brand licensing companies: (IP ThinkTank), Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement moves forward: (Michael Geist) Global - Patents Office Open XML voted to become official standard, so out of Microsoft’s hands: (Ars… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  The UEA London Lecture will be given by Dr Daithí Mac Síthigh  on Thursday 20 October 2011 under the title “Tweeteasy? [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
He states that you take regular medication. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
He states that you take regular medication. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
 So when the judge says The question is not whether facilities are better in London than in the Western Cape. - he is making a point about the proper considerations to be taken in to account in whether a court should or should not allow a country to export a citizen for trial by a foreign state. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
(Thanks to Rob Wintemute of the Faculty of Law, Kings College, London, for forwarding an email that prompted me to this comparison.) [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]