Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 3301 - 3320 of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 3:56 pm by Emma Llanso
  As Justice Scalia detailed in the Court’s opinion, stories intended for young audiences – from Grimm’s Fairy Tales to The Lord of the Flies  – often depict children grappling with, and even committing, violence. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
” The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
In language that today seems almost comical, the House charged that: Andrew Johnson as the Chief Magistrate of the United States, did, on the 18th day of August, in the year of our Lord 1866, and on divers other days and times, as well before as afterward, make and deliver with a loud voice certain intemperate, inflammatory, and scandalous harangues, and did therein utter loud threats and bitter menaces as well against Congress amid the cries, jeers, and laughter of the multitudes… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am by Alasdair Henderson
Third, where the use of force by a State’s agents operating outside its territory bring an individual under the control of the State’s authorities, and thereby into its jurisdiction (the examples given here involve Issa v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm by charonqc
As can be shown from Hirst v UK (No2), the Separation of Powers is ineffective. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:25 am by Giles Peaker
Accordingly, I agree with my Lord that the terms of paragraph (j) of clause 5(4) do not extend to cover legal costs in the service charge. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On 1 October 2013 there is an application in in the case of Subotic v Knezevic On 4 October 2013 there is an application in Bewry v Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd Next week in Parliament The House of Commons and the House of Lords are in recess and will next sit on Tuesday [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Morgan:  Possibly…What we know for a fact about Lady Heather Mills McCartney is that in their divorce case Paul McCartney stated as a fact that she had recorded their conversations and given them to the media. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
As we have reported in a post last week Lord Neuberger’s made general comments about anonymity in court proceedings in the court of appeal. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]